Reports of the death of the Route 17 expansion were, apparently, exaggerated.
The Department of Transportation's $1.3-billion plan to add a lane in each direction of state road in Orange and Sullivan counties is apparently moving forward, despite an announcement last October of a pause that anti-highway activists believed meant the project was on the rocks.

But it looks like the pause was, indeed, just a pause.
"What we've heard from state DOT leadership is that what has been called a 'pause' is more of a delay," Rethink Route 17 Alliance spokesperson Taylor Jaffe told Streetsblog.
State DOT says the controversial project will reduce travel times between Exit 120 in Middletown and Exit 131 in Harriman, albeit by mere minutes. The stated rationale for the pause was to allow regional stakeholders to comment further on the project, not to kill it outright, as opponents had hoped.
Obviously, supporters of the widening are overjoyed.
"We have a very strong commitment from Gov. Hochul and [state] DOT that the project is going to be moving forward," said Daniel Ortega, a founding member of 17-Forward-86 Coalition, which believes that the highway needs to be widened under the debunked notion that a wider highway will better accommodate traffic headed towards two Resorts World Casinos (in Monticello and Newburgh) and the Legoland amusement park in Goshen.

State DOT said it "remains committed to this project," but is also "still undertaking [a] review and analysis," a spokesperson said in a statement.
The agency added that the project's final costs, and where the money will come from, "will be outlined in the final Record of Decision, which we expect to release in the second half of 2026."
But critics say the agency horse of expansion is way ahead of its cart of review and analysis.
Indeed, a bridge that carries Route 17 over the Wallkill River just outside of Mechanicstown is already being widened to accommodate three lanes. This $68-million "anchor" section of the project will be completed in late 2026.
While technically separate, it is the first step in transforming state Route 17 into a highway that meets federal interstate standards.
The Rethink Route 17 Alliance wants to see the funding used for additional bus lanes, park-and-ride options and road improvements on local streets instead of a betrayal of the state's climate commitments to reduce car dependency.
Activists also wanted the state to consider adding HOV lanes to the highway, but state highway planners felt encouraging carpooling would not have alleviated traffic congestion.
Nor have state DOT highway-builders considered the long-established phenomenon of induced demand, which states that when highways are widened to reduce congestion, the result is more congestion. Activists have pointed that out time and again.
"It would be a real disservice to our communities if we, in a few years, are looking at a six-lane highway along Route 17 with more congestion, more pollution, more greenhouse gas emissions and still no transportation alternatives," Jaffe said.
Stay in touch
Sign up for our free newsletter






